DVD vs VHS. Best for home viewing - Christopher Lee Forums
Home
Go Back   Christopher Lee Web > Forums > Discussion Forums > Generalised Topics on CL

Generalised Topics on CL Topics on CL which do not fit any other category.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 18th November 2002, 07:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,549
Rep Power: 59
Juan Aneiros is on a distinguished road
With a film like SW, then yes DVD is the best home format.

When it comes to classical films, VHS IMO is much better. The menus are handy, the extras are nice but the picture restoration takes away all the atmosphere from the film.

I watched HOD on DVD yesterday and to be honest, I don't know what the fuss was all about. The picture is clear, the sound is excellent but the atmosphere isn't there. Doesn't look like a classical film anymore, there is no feel to it, nothing. When it comes to darker films like The Whip and the Body, this is even more noticeable. You simply cannot compare watching an original Italian VHS release with all its faults with the DVD.

It would be nice is they just made a straight transfer leaving out all the improvements. There are times when technology is a step backwards.
Juan Aneiros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2002, 07:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Alfonso Casal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1,821
Rep Power: 0
Alfonso Casal is an unknown quantity at this point
Hmmm. . . you raise a point worth considering re atmosphere.

There was a time when I bought everything that came out on DVD. Now, I've come to realize that that could just be a waste of money, if one already has the film on video. All things being equal, now if a film I already have comes out on DVD, I'll stick to my video.

An exception would be interesting extras or a VASTLY improved quality over the standard video release. Case in point, I probably won't end up getting the HoD DVD as there doesn't seem to be enough improvement (and no worthwhile extras) to merit the cost. However, I WILL get the CoF DVD as the standard Warner VHS here in the States was notoriously poor in quality.
__________________
"He's got the power and you're so weak; and your frustration will not let you speak. La-la, la-la, la, la."
-- After the Fire, Der Kommissar.
Alfonso Casal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2002, 08:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Matt Gemmell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Age: 44
Posts: 1,022
Rep Power: 0
Matt Gemmell is an unknown quantity at this point
I can see where you're coming from on this one Juan but I do'nt agree . DVD is superior in every way . Now we can finally see films as they were originally intended ( sometimes even better )
I know what you mean regarding the atmosphere but , remember , the picture was not meant to be fuzzy or dark in the first place .
I used to have a fondness for the old flea pit style of cinemas I grew up in but now realise that the modern multi plexis are a better way of viewing films ( with the exception of the tiny screens )
Personally I'm delighted with the recent releases and can't wait for more and , hey , the plus side for vhs lovers is that the prices have crashed so low you can almost buy them with loose change .
If someone had told me that 20 years ago I would have thought them mad .
Matt Gemmell is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2002, 08:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,549
Rep Power: 59
Juan Aneiros is on a distinguished road
Matt,

Of course DVD is superior in every way but for me I prefer to see classical films in their original state without any digital improvements.

If someone was to watch HOD for the very first time on DVD, they probably dismiss it as junk. However, seing it on VHS they can appreciate the classical feel. Any way, that's just my opinion as I don't care too much for Hammer films in the first place. But at least with The Whip and the Body, I can tell you that the VHS copy I have is better than the DVD. It's like watching two completely different films.

Would you rather listen to Mozart play a piano or a keyboard?
Juan Aneiros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2002, 09:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Matt Gemmell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Age: 44
Posts: 1,022
Rep Power: 0
Matt Gemmell is an unknown quantity at this point
Juan
Like I said , I understand your point of view . It's very much like the vinyl vs cd debate . Personally I go for the cd but that's just me . It does remind me of something Tobe Hooper said when he saw the dvd of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre . " The last time I saw the film look this good was through the viewfinder."
Maybe you're right and the older movies were,nt supposed to look this good , it's something I would like to ask the filmmakers and actors .
I can't remember who the artist was but I recall a story of a famous painter who , on seeing one of his works at a gallery ,was unhappy with it and went to make some changes . The security gaurd stopped him and when he protested stating he was the artist , he was told . Leave it , it belongs to the people now .. . . . . . interesting .
Matt Gemmell is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2002, 10:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,549
Rep Power: 59
Juan Aneiros is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Maybe you're right and the older movies were,nt supposed to look this good , it's something I would like to ask the filmmakers and actors
Well, look at Portabella. He shot "El Umbracle" and "Cuadecuc" in black and white with an antique camera on purpose. Now, those are classics. Doesn't mean they don't look good because visually they are as satisfying as watching AOTC. Film is a form of art, just like any other. That is why actors are called artists.
Juan Aneiros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2002, 01:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The Highlands, Louisville, KY
Age: 30
Posts: 451
Rep Power: 0
Josslyn is an unknown quantity at this point
I no longer buy movies on VHS for three reasons: often they aren't cheaper than the DVD, the DVD will last much longer (rather than getting eaten by my VCR), and often DVDs have bonus materials that are interesting (like The Wicker Man).
That being said, I see where our Admin is coming from. I own several Charlie Chaplin films on DVD (yes, there are extras) and I was delighted that the movies themselves were not "restored" but were taken from the best copies of the existing films. That is part of the fun of watching a classic film - seeing its age. I have a feeling that they might lose a little bit of their charm if they had been wholly digitally remastered.
Josslyn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2002, 10:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 0
Lamoreux is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
... but now realise that the modern multi plexis are a better way of viewing films ( with the exception of the tiny screens )...
Sorry to get off topic, but I found the above statement very interesting, Matt. Please don't think I'm asking you to defend your position, but I'm very curious why you think the new multi plex theatres are better?
The theatre in the small town I grew up in now features nine screens in the same building that once held a single large screen. I saw Star Wars in 1977 with a packed audience of over 600 people. Personally, it saddens me that it was an experience my children will never know.

Doug
Lamoreux is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2002, 12:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Joakim Lundberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Stockholm. Sweden
Age: 26
Posts: 804
Rep Power: 0
Joakim Lundberg is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Well, look at Portabella. He shot "El Umbracle" and "Cuadecuc" in black and white with an antique camera on purpose. Now, those are classics. Doesn't mean they don't look good because visually they are as satisfying as watching AOTC. Film is a form of art, just like any other. That is why actors are called artists.
That is so true. A wish I have and something I hope will be reality some day is that we can go back to using handwaved cameras when shooting a picture. You know those kind of cameras that where used by Murnau, Sjöström, Stiller etc. I like VHS but there is nothing like watching a good old classic film that has been restored released on DVD with the same quality as it was when released. The problem sometimes with buying films is that the quality on the picture can be awful. If you buy a DVD from anchorbay or MGM DVD you are assured to have a good quality on the copy.
__________________
-I would never belong to any club who would have someone like me for a member- Groucho Marx
Joakim Lundberg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2002, 03:56 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Dave Hutchens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 0
Dave Hutchens is an unknown quantity at this point
I'm with Matt on this one, all the way.

As a video retailer, I hear this argument every single day, and I have to say I'm astounded that there's anyone out there still defending/in preference of the VHS format.

If a fuzzy, dark, grainy image is preferrable, then I suppose VHS is the one to stick with. I personally prefer digital clarity, allowing me to view films as they were intended to be seen. I also can't watch movies if they're not in their theatrical widescreen. Knowing I'm seeing only slightly better than half of the movie is abhorrent to me.

Extras, for me, are actually the least significant aspect of DVD's superiority. I rarely get around to watching them.

Anyway, this argument is entirely moot. VHS's days are numbered, and I'm counting. :)
__________________
Dave
Dave Hutchens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2002, 06:11 AM   #11 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Alfonso Casal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 1,821
Rep Power: 0
Alfonso Casal is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
VHS's days are numbered, and I'm counting. :)
You're quite right. But, on the other hand, to quote Jay Leno when CDs first came out: "Exactly how many times am I going to have to buy Meet the Beatles?" ;)
__________________
"He's got the power and you're so weak; and your frustration will not let you speak. La-la, la-la, la, la."
-- After the Fire, Der Kommissar.
Alfonso Casal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2002, 06:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I get Juan's point but you can't argue that DVD has in a way revolutionased how we see films. Yet it's not 100% digital. It all depends on your television as even though the dvd is digital if you got an analogue tv set then it's not! Not that the difference is majorly reduced to the untrained eye but I just thought I would point it out.
Now if you got yourself one of those nice flatscreen plasma screens your laughing because then you will know what digital really is.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2002, 04:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Downers Grove, Illinois USA
Age: 49
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 0
Mike Schneider is an unknown quantity at this point
I buy DVD over VHS anytime. Quality, clarity, the extras. I also prefer the widescreen format. Besides these reasons, I get upset when the VCR decides it's hungry and there goes my money. Another nice thing is they take up less space on the shelf.

I can remember buying Horror Hotel on VHS and the copy was so bad I could hardly view it. The DVD is clean and crisp. I bought a movie on VHS when it first came out. A few weeks later it came out on widescreen tape. Now this was just around the time DVD players were coming out but I hadn't gotten one yet. Now I have the movie on DVD and have sold my VHS versions on Ebay. I do agree that we don't need 4 versions of a DVD. I like widescreen personally.

Nothing takes the place of seeing a film on the big screen, especially one as nice as the town I live in. 74 years old, restored with 1050 seats, Dolby Digital Surround Sound THX... they even have a guy playing a pipe organ on weekends. It's beautiful... but I do digress.

I don't have a problem watching a film with graininess or atmosphere especially if the directors intent was such. I just don't like it because of bad film quality or age.

Long live DVD! Now I just need one of those big 'ol plasma bad boy flat thangs to watch the talkies on.
Mike Schneider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2002, 09:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
star38
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you are all right, I buy both, silly I know, but then I get the best of both worlds.





star38
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2002, 08:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Georgia-USA
Posts: 165
Rep Power: 0
Wendy Wood is an unknown quantity at this point
I love DVD for the special features and storage capacity. However, I often stick with my VHS copy if a DVD has nothing much beyond what is on the VHS version. I intially bought a DVD player because of Mr. Lee. Two of his films had commentaries by him at the time. I had to hear those commetaries! He was wondeful and I love to hear them over and over to this day! :)
__________________
"Tomorrow is another day." -----Scarlett O'Hara
Wendy Wood is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Boy Who Left Home to Find Out About the Shivers Anonymous Generalised Topics on CL 11 7th October 2002 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 AM.

1

Copyright ©2000 - 2008 Christopher Lee Web (CLW). All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy|
top of page
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10